Ask Mr. Smartypants

Fred Thompson for President (of what, the AV Club)

Posted November 05th 2007 12:01:15 pm by Lane Filler
Categories: Quick Hits

Thompson will be in the area this week, but for those who don't get out to see him, but think they might want to vote for him, the video clip you can access by clicking on this link is a must-see (and not just because I'm in it for a second, lookin' all hot and journalistic.)

http://www.goupstate.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?Category=multimedia101&ID=1173350940

 It's a must-see because it's 12 minutes of a guy who so badly doesn't want to be president that he'd do anything to avoid winning the job. Sean Flynn and I covered the event and this video was shot on September 10 on his bus, while he relaxed and refused to answer any question more contoversial than "Did you used to smoke cigarettes."

And had the answer been yes, he might have equivocated on that one too.

He and I got started off badly when I asked him to go through his wallet with me and show me what he carried, what he belonged to, and what kind of man he was. Mike Huckabee did this with me and I think it led to a pretty fun, informative column.

 Thompson's spoken answer was, "No, I won't do that," but his eyes went even further, clearly stating, "Get the @#$% outta here with that mess."

 And he just had no thoughts on anything. At one point in his speech at the Airport Marriott he actually said,"We need to do more of what is working and stop doing what isn't working."

"Bravo, sir. Finally someone has the courage to stand up against failure and take the side of poor,oft-maligned success."

 On Iraq, "The soultion is to do whatever we need to do whatever is necessary to stabilize that place."

Okay. Valium in the water supply, nukes, Albus Dumbledore casting a spell? I'm glad you're pro-stability, and I expect you to out-poll the anti-stability candidates, as soon as they declare.

On Social Security, Thompson said of the underfunding problem and its solution, "It's got to start with the American people," which is true in a way, but does he expect us to just start tucking an extra $1,000 in with our taxes each April. It's probably going to take some legislation.

As for what method of fixing Social Security he favored, Thompson nailed it, saying, "There's some directions we can go in, plenty of proposals on the table."

 Indeed. 

 The crux if what he said that day is that he's in favor of a good economy, and against raising taxes.

Did I miss a speech by some other Republican candidate who was against a good economy and for raising taxes.

Thompson summed up his speech that day by asserting that if he does't win the nomination he'll just go back to being the happiest husband and father in the world, and judging by how far above himself he married in terms of looks and pizzazz, I think that's true.

So Fred, you do that.

And voters, on primary day, please understand the real message of Thompson and get off your duff to cast a ballot.

There may not be anyone you want to vote for, but there is always somebody to vote against.

15 comments

Comment from: Ron [Visitor] Email
Although very funny, I think this article was too harsh. Thompson wants to be president but I don't believe it is a dream of his. He is willing to be himself in interviews and to be vulnerable to looking uninterested. However, he is not uninterested, he is just more reserved and laid-back than the rest of the canidates. I like it!
November 21st 2007 @ 12:33 am
Comment from: Lame Laney [Visitor] Email
First off, poor taste self promoting on other sites. Must be job review time for lamey.

Perhaps you would prefer to have a Dallas Cowboy Cheerleader than someone who is serious about the issues at hand. Thompson is the only candidate who has had the guts to make policy stands. The rest have been arm chair fluff.

I want a leader. I don't need to be told I did a good job and am a good person. What I need is someone to be sober, truthful, and willing to say it as things are.

We have had enough smoke and mirrors.

Lane Filler responds: I do promote on other sites by spreading my URLs around, but very transparently. How else would people find my work, which I believe has merit and is worth reading.
As far as Thompson, he has no real campaign. He just isn't running for President in any meaningful sense. That doesn't make him a bad guy, or a good guy, it just makes him a guy nobody is going to vote for.
November 23rd 2007 @ 2:45 pm
Comment from: Angie [Visitor] Email
Whoever commented "Lame Lamey" and couldn't even leave their own name....

"someone who is serious about the issues at hand".

Are you kidding me!? In all the speaches I have heard, all of the articles I have read covering this man, I have not yet once even heard him even attempt to come up with any kind of numbers, ideas, philosophies, plans for what he would actually want to do as the leader of a nation of 300 MILLION people. I know Law and Order was popular, but he only had to fake his way through a few million viewers.

Someone who has no stance on Terri Schaivo, someone who can't come up with any better comments than "we just gotta stay the course" someone who in a PLANNED interview on Meet the Press, an interview that can really put someone out there, he merely spat out a few incomplete sentences without any actual coherent thought, idea, nothing. What are his campaign people doing all day. Obviously not talking about what the plan is, or how maybe he should have a clue about current events...If anyone could memorize some decent material to regurgitate in front of cameras, it should be him, and yet I have seen better Junior High Student Council speeches. He is and embarrassment to this process.

Thanks Laney for saying what all educated people are thinking.
November 25th 2007 @ 4:06 am
Comment from: Jimbo [Visitor] Email
Amazing. He really is the grumpy old guy next door yelling at the kids to keep off his lawn.

Is this the best we can do? Are we the same country who elected Washington and Jefferson and Lincoln? Because this interview alone should be enough to disqualify this guy for public office. This one interview alone.

And I pray, I literally pray that your first two commenters were paid Thompson operatives. It's scary to think that there are actually such servile Americans out there. But hey, lots of people voted for Bush. Twice even.
November 25th 2007 @ 4:32 pm
Comment from: Gene [Visitor] Email
Thompson's spoken answer was, "No, I won't do that," but his eyes went even further, clearly stating, "Get the @#$% outta here with that mess."

What!? Fred not proud of his Council on Foreign Relations card?
November 26th 2007 @ 12:35 am
Comment from: Winghunter [Visitor] Email · http://www.fred08.com
What a poor hatchet job.

Instead of looking through wallets other than your own you should be researching on the net and finding out what Fred is talking about and not on a campaign stop.

No one else has tackled AND solved our Social Security deficit...he didn't wait until it was a crisis, THAT'S a leader. He knows you can't fight judicial activism with a Constitutional amendment but, he rightly outlines how to fix it which will work. He understands how to correct the illegal immigrant situation and he will follow it through.

Your laughable aspersion about his not knowing about the Schiavo case was mindnumbing idiocy at best...When you also have a daughter inwhich you have to make the same type of decision you let us know.

AND who is the moonbat who posted just before me?? A poster child for a prophylactic no doubt.


Lane Filler answers: Sure, his Social Security plan would have some merit if he didn'y claim (yesterday) that the revenue would have to be used to make up the massive general fund deficit his tax cuts will create. I do like "posetr child for a prophylactic," though.



November 26th 2007 @ 2:50 am
Comment from: jason [Visitor] Email
This actually turned me to Fred. He is a straight-ahead guy who communicates well with the American people. Bush's policies would have gone over better if he had learned to communicate his ideas better with you and me.


Fred is seen here as a regular guy with ideas that resonate with the American people. He is the perfect combination of seeing every day Americans as "regular people" and seeing them as more intelligent than what the media makes them out to be.

To Fred, we are "regular" but still intelligent.

Very few in the media see us this way.


They see "regular" Americans as stupid or ignorant.



Fred sees "regular" Americans as the intelligent people we are.

Lane Filler responds: Liar, liar pants on fire. That video wouldn't turn a rotating disco ball to Fred. You are a Fred supporter trying to convince other folks that he's a "regular" guy. He is a guy whose candidacy consists of sniping at other candidates and fronting tax cuts (yesterday) that are going to eat up the benefits of his Social Security plan.
November 26th 2007 @ 1:20 pm
Comment from: what for [Visitor] Email
Lane,

The next time I need a liberal, sorry Progressive, to tell me who not to vote for in a Republican primary, I'll ask. In the meantime, chew on this. Cutting taxes is not stealing from the poor and allowing younger workers an opportunity to save for their own retirement is not stealing from government.

Critiquing anything during the opening credits is a disservice to the audiences and a sad commentary on the laziness and arrogance of this generation of journalists. (term used loosely)

Lane Filler responds: Nobody who knows me has ever called me a liberal. Progressive...maybe, once or twice...sorry, definitely, I've been called that. The taxpayers owe $8 trillion, paying it back is a conservative principal, not repaying it is not.
November 28th 2007 @ 12:05 am
Comment from: Michael Splinter [Visitor] Email
Yes, of course, there is Hillary Rotton Clinton to vote against.
December 02nd 2007 @ 4:17 pm
Comment from: patsy [Visitor] Email
You have no business going through someone's belongings. You need to grow up and listen to Fred Thompson. You might learn something.

Lane Filler responds: We went through his wallet together, Huckabee and I. Get help.
December 03rd 2007 @ 8:45 am
Comment from: Lanes a wuss [Visitor]
Your an Idiot you said this : Lane Filler responds: Liar, liar pants on fire. That video wouldn't turn a rotating disco ball to Fred. You are a Fred supporter trying to convince other folks that he's a "regular" guy. He is a guy whose candidacy consists of sniping at other candidates and fronting tax cuts (yesterday) that are going to eat up the benefits of his Social Security plan. What are you 12 ??? This is exactly why I can't take you serious YOU HATE FRED and reading your bias column states so great jounalism LMAO Idiot
December 09th 2007 @ 10:25 am
Comment from: Alan Srout [Visitor] Email · http://www.Fred08.com
They Said It: Thompson Social Security Plan Applauded as ‘Courageous,’ ‘Honest,’ and ‘Substantive’

Courage & Honesty

Republican presidential contender Fred Thompson’s plan to save Social Security and protect seniors, which he introduced Friday afternoon in a Washington, D.C., hotel, differs starkly from standard election year pablum on the subject in one key way: He’s actually treating voters like adults. (ABC, 11/9)

Thompson...is seeking to show he is willing to take on tough issues if elected in November 2008, telling a news conference in Washington he was the only candidate to offer an extensive Social Security plan. (Reuters, 11/10)

“You certainly have to admire his courage for putting this out,” said Alan Viard with the American Enterprise Institute. (Tennessean, 11/10)

Supporters contend that Thompson’s willingness to take on the so-called third rail of politics will impress voters. (Bloomberg, 11/10)

Conservative economic experts applauded Thompson for offering specifics on an issue considered to be politically dangerous. (Tennessean, 11/10)

“He’s not afraid to be brutally honest with the American people about the challenges that lie ahead,” said Representative Zach Wamp, a Tennessee Republican who is working to recruit supporters for Thompson. “People can tell the difference between a strong leader telling the truth and a weak leader talking politics.” (Bloomberg, 11/10)

Substance

[Thompson is] the first candidate of either party to offer a detailed proposal to fix the nation’s retirement system. (WP, 11/10)

The Republican candidate laid out a detailed, four-page proposal (WSJ, 11/10)

Mr. Thompson’s plan...was more specific than what the Bush White House put on the table when it sought to overhaul the system. It also varied substantially from the traditional conservative approach of focusing primarily on personal investment accounts. (NYT, 11/10)

Economist Jason Furman said Thompson deserves credit for offering a detailed plan to address the projected Social Security shortfall...(Bloomberg, 11/10)

In discussing policy, Thompson was in his element. (Politico, 11/9)

He’d prefer to talk about substance. (Politico, 11/9)

Thompson’s plan draws on ideas favored by conservatives: a reduction in benefits, rather than an increase in payroll taxes; and a shift toward private accounts, rather than government-provided payments. (WP, 11/10)

Rivals

[Thompson] ventured Friday into an area few rivals have tread: advocacy of a fundamental overhaul of Social Security. (WSJ, 11/10)

Although all of the presidential candidates have spoken, when asked, about the need to fix the Social Security system, none has offered such a detailed plan nor talked so eagerly and often about the issue. (WSJ, 11/10)

Among Republicans, former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani, Arizona Sen. John McCain and former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney have talked in general terms ... but none has offered a specific plan. (WP, 11/10)

Mr. Thompson is the only one of the Republicans running for the White House who has made Social Security a central theme of his campaign. (NYT, 11/10)

He is the only presidential candidate so far to make Social Security an anchor of his campaign. (WSJ, 11/10)

But with less than two months before the 2008 voting begins, candidates have generally been reluctant to confront the Social Security issue. (WP, 11/10)


Lane Filler responds: Yeah, it's too bad his proposed tax cuts eat all the revenue his Social Security plan creates.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Saving and Protecting Social Security
A Plan to Ensure Retirement Security for All Americans
http://www.fred08.com/virtual/socialsecurity.aspx


December 12th 2007 @ 2:02 am
Comment from: robe [Visitor]
Has anyone besides me stumbled upon a Fred Thompson story/site in the last seven or eight months? Have all 200 of the Fred 08 people moved on to Bob Barr already. Dont be quitters! I for one believe Fred can still Walk Hard! Write 'em in!
July 30th 2008 @ 1:23 am
Comment from: robe [Visitor]
I said walk hard not cough hard Fred! I wonder if John McCains mom enjoyed Freds hauntingly detailed account of her sons time as a POW? Fred sure seemed to and it proves all of you wrong. Fred has not lost his tuch. http://www.236.com/video/2008/fred_thompson_clears_throat_8700.php
September 07th 2008 @ 11:20 pm
Comment from: john brightman [Visitor] · http://www.whoismark.com
HI
looks very interesting!
bookmarked your blog.
john brightman
May 25th 2009 @ 12:30 pm

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
::


About this blog

Herald-Journal columnist and editor Lane Filler promises to answer any and all questions, no matter how silly or serious (as long as they're not actionable or erotic in an icky way), in his blog, 'Ask Mr. Smartypants.' Filler brings to the table all the skills and knowledge of a man who has been married for almost 350 weeks (in a row, people), maintains a credit score in excess of 144 and can, if pressed, name Adlai Stevenson's running mate and explain what a second cousin three times removed is. He does not, shamefully, know the difference between beige. taupe and mauve